Are women at greater risk solely because of their
gender?
It’s
rightly said, “ Behind every man is a woman ” or “God made a woman to be strong
and not to be trampled under the feet of men ”. If the women today can be at
par with men and can work twice as hard as men by taking care of their job,
their family and their house at the same time then why shouldn’t women
journalist be allowed to visit a conflict zone when getting sexually assaulted
is not their mistake?
After the death of male colleagues, people rarely question if men should be sent into war zones, but when women are sexually assaulted, the question is immediately asked as to whether women should report from dangerous places. Rather than questioning the freedom of sending women for her duty or worrying for their safety, editors and news organizations should focus on preparing women for the threat of sexual violence and helping them prevent it by creating awareness and educating them about the precautions to take.
After the death of male colleagues, people rarely question if men should be sent into war zones, but when women are sexually assaulted, the question is immediately asked as to whether women should report from dangerous places. Rather than questioning the freedom of sending women for her duty or worrying for their safety, editors and news organizations should focus on preparing women for the threat of sexual violence and helping them prevent it by creating awareness and educating them about the precautions to take.
In
February 2011 the South African-born journalist and CBS foreign affairs
correspondent Lara Logan was covering events in Tahrir Square when she was
brutally sustained to sexual assault and beating. Logan came out fighting,
beginning a new chapter in the discussion about the safety of women
journalists. She stated, “I want the world to know that I am not ashamed of
what happened to me. I want everyone to know I was not simply attacked – I was
sexually assaulted. This was, from the very first moment, about me as a woman.
But ultimately, I was just a tool. This was about something bigger than all of
us – it was about what we do as journalists. That ancient tactic of terrifying
people into submission or silence.”
Rather than restricting them from
going to such places, they should be provided with ways and measures to prevent
this. They should be protected and not easily accessible to strange men. Some
people say it’s because of the cloths a women / journalist wears that tempts
tempts the attack and thus women are at fault but why if men are allowed to
freely wear whatever they want and whatever they like then why should there be
a restriction on women? Isn’t every human being born free? Every human being
has the right to do whatever he or she want and wear whatever he or she like.
Don’t they? Then why should women be told what to wear and what not to wear?
Nowadays it’s not even about the cloths. In a survey no particular dressing of
females has increased the rape rate. No matter what they wear or how they dress
up they are still sexually assaulted. It is the responsibility of the news
channel to ensure that the female reporter is safe and is provided with
protection while they are on the job and the knowledge to help herself in
situations like these.
In places like women refugee
camps and conservative places where women are comfortable talking to only
female reporters, in such situations women journalist are very necessary. It also
happens that if a girl is raped she would rather be more comfortable speaking
to female reporter who has gone through the same than a male reporter who will
make her feel awkward. In such situations the news channel cannot avoid sending
the female journalist, the journalist should be sent with proper protection for
her safely.
Fadel,
who has reported from Baghdad and who won the George R. Polk Award for
outstanding foreign reporting in 2007, was detained briefly by military police
in Egypt earlier this month ("I suddenly found myself blindfolded and
handcuffed and in jail," she said in an audio post soon after the
incident). Still, she says now, preventing women from reporting on dangerous
situations is not the answer.
Milligan
a journalist based in Budapest for years recalls an incident in Kosovo in 1999.
"I was with two male reporters and a female translator. We saw a village
being burned down, and stupidly drove to it. Then we were surrounded by super
paramilitary with guns, who dragged us out and held guns to our skulls and
threatened to kill us." Having both men and women in the group changed the dynamic, she says. "They
were more willing to believe that we weren't soldiers or part of a movement. It
was good to have a mixed group. I think that's why we got out of there
alive."
As Milligan said men and women
should be sent together to avoid situations like these.
I truly believe that preventing a female journalist from going to
conflict places is not right. Agreed that there are many risks involved, nobody made Lara Logan go to Egypt. Yes,
reporting in a war zone is risky. But it's a risk that we choose to take
because it's an important part of democracy, telling people what's going on.
-Rhea Khanna
Hey Rhea,
ReplyDeleteYour article has a very catchy introduction; however your statement could be stated in a more firm manner. You have some extremely strong points which I feel have merged into the article and have not been shown boldly. Your introductory paragraph does lead into the argument and you’ve used enough facts and examples to support your argument however the examples could have been more apt, making your reasoning sound more interesting and strong. Also it would have been nice to have seen you explored the opposite position too. You have very nice and logical points and I feel they would create a bigger impact if organized properly. Also the beginning two phrases, the first one, “Behind every SUCCESFUL man is a woman” does not seem to go too well with the whole article. Overall I would say, good job on the article just a few minor adjustments are needed.