Surprisingly, after Lara
Logan, an experienced reporter and a paramount foreign columnist for CBS news,
was attacked and sexually assailed in Cairo, news network supposedly assembled
to debate of drawing their female journalists out of any war zones. An attempt
that some journalists’ say is comprehensible and likely, and where some say it
is hypothetically offending and unsafe. What we have to decide is where do we
stand? Do we really agree with “women journalists being sent out to cover conflict
zones?”
Logan
came out to be rebellious, initiating a fresh new chapter in the debate about
the protection of women journalists. She firmly said, “I want the world to know
that I am not ashamed of what happened to me. I want everyone to know I was not
simply attacked – I was sexually assaulted. This was, from the very first
moment, about me as a woman. But ultimately, I was just a tool. This was about
something bigger than all of us – it was about what we do as journalists. That
ancient tactic of terrifying people into submission or silence.” However,
according to me that ancient tactic did not work.
To address the above
issue, the International News Safety Institute (INSI) investigated the extent
of these other dangers in a survey conducted in 2010 that asked whether women
reporters found the task of reporting from a conflict situation especially
difficult. The women surveyed included freelancers and staff members, traveling
reporters, women based in foreign bureaus and line producers and managers. The
INSI survey data suggested that more than 80 percent of respondents reported
physical attack or intimidation while covering conflict. However, the majority
of the responses indicated that many women journalists working in conflict
areas do not believe that should be treated differently from their male
colleagues. This conclusion held true with regard to most of the journalists
interviewed for this project.
Conversely, several of
the women interviewed thought that their job as journalists in conflict zones
was not more difficult because of their sex. However, the trick for journalists of either gender
is to fly below the radar. But trying to be modest can be hard. “A TV camera
already draws a lot of attention and makes you stand out,” says BBC foreign
affairs correspondent, Orla Guerin. “You need to dress in a way that doesn’t
compound that. The aim is to connect with people, not antagonize them.” This
arouses another question of “Whether gender makes a difference in
covering a conflict by women who are playing a major role in the once virtually
all-male preserve of battlefield reporting?”
According to this view,
the "female personality reporters" - like the female newsreader and
the female presenter - are part of a deliberately thought-out media strategy to
attract viewers and readers. Whether
this is true or not, it is an incontrovertible fact that almost everywhere
women's share of media jobs has increased steadily over the past two decades,
and that female senior executives are not uncommon. But despite these advances,
however capable they are and ready to "risk their lives" in the
pursuit of their profession, women working in the media, may today be reduced
to the status of "a (preferably pretty) woman in a flak jacket". Even
today, women media professionals are likely to be judged in a quite different
way from their male peers.
In contrast, the risk associated with being
a war correspondent isn't limited to women, says Badkhen, who has covered wars
in Iraq, Afghanistan and number of media outlets, "I categorically do not
believe that women war correspondents are more vulnerable than war
correspondents who are men.”
This shows that both female and male correspondents have been raped. Male colleagues whom she knows have been subjected to torture that involved their sexual organs. The nature of torture, the origin of torture, is to degrade, to render the tortured helpless. The torturer typically goes for methods both the torturer and the tortured consider the most humiliating.
This shows that both female and male correspondents have been raped. Male colleagues whom she knows have been subjected to torture that involved their sexual organs. The nature of torture, the origin of torture, is to degrade, to render the tortured helpless. The torturer typically goes for methods both the torturer and the tortured consider the most humiliating.
Personally, after having
followed all of the above, I do agree it is a huge responsibility. Sometimes I
even ask myself if I would have been capable of accepting the challenges, those
woman journalists accepted. In most places women have been regarded almost as a
third gender. They aren’t treated like the women of the place. They aren’t
treated like the men. But in traditional societies, where cordiality outplays ideology,
they are always accorded the special pleasures afforded to guests. For most people and me, there’s no question
that women shouldn’t be sent to report from the frontline. But they should be
prepared. In
conservative societies, that also includes a belief that women need to be
protected. Sadly that belief was not one that extended to the treatment of
Logan in Cairo.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePositives :
ReplyDeleteThe beginning and the ending of the right up are quite engaging and impactful in the sense they raised many valid questions on our society which need to be answered. Stating your personal opinion added to it.
Also keeping Lara Logan as the centre of argument and mentioning both sides of the issue strengthened your stand but at the same time allowed the reader to form her/his own opinion.
Areas of improvement :
The progression of the write up is fine but it could be more direct and linked to the para preceding and succeeding it.(for example - 1st and the 2nd paragraph )
There is a strong rebuttal in the second last paragraph but overall there is more scope for it.(for example 4th and 5th paragraphs)
The way information has been delivered in the middle goes one after the other with leaving no interval to absorb it.Some space for your own thoughts or comments is required or maybe reducing the information might help.
Also giving some solutions to the problem is advisable.
I hope these suggestions will be of good use to you and would help enrich your piece.